Isaac Boro: A Challenge to Youth Leaders
Today
By Priye Torulagha
Isaac Boro was a leader in the true sense of the word. He was a man of the people, hence, was willing
to sacrifice his life for the good of the people. To him, money was simply an instrument for
advancing the cause of the people and not as a means for self enrichment and
gratification. If getting rich were his
ambition, he would not have left the Nigerian Police Force. In fact, he would have transferred to the
Criminal Investigation Department or the Traffic Department. Instead, he left the force and castigated it
for being too corrupt.
Isaac Boro tamed his ego. He knew that ego was a negative energy and
could not be beneficial to the peoples struggle. Hence, he mingled with everyone, educated and
uneducated, urbanized and traditionalized, sophisticated and
unsophisticated. He could trek, eat, and
sleep in the forest without complaining, even though he was an urbanite. Therefore, Boro was a bridge that binds
everyone together, regardless of education, wealth, and social class.
Isaac Boro was an action man, hence, he acted swiftly when
the need arose. But do not be misled,
Isaac was also a political genius, hence, a superb diplomat of the first
order. That was why he was able to become
the student government leader at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, established
political contacts with the national powers-that-be, and sued them when he did
not like what was going on. In
association with Samuel Owunari and Nothingham Dick, he established the Niger
Delta Volunteer Force. The force was
divided into three commands, namely, Eastern, Western, and Central to reflect
and embrace the entirety of the ethnic geography.
He was a combination of action and diplomacy, hence, he
listened to the people while he fought. For instance, after declaring the Niger Delta
Republic and engaging Nigeria’s security forces in an effort to enforce the new
republic, he surrendered, not because he was captured or defeated, but because he listened to the people,
particularly, the elders who negotiated
a settlement. As a result of the
diplomatic negotiations, the surrender was prearranged. The surrender is particularly emphasized here
to bring home the fact that he was not arrogant, was not interested in money or
self glory, and did not want to become a super star that everyone had to kowtow
to. He surrendered for the sake of the
people.
In short, Isaac Boro was very multidimensional in his
approach to the issues. Even while at the
war front, he would come to Lagos and put pressure on the Federal Government to
hire more citizens of Rivers State and the Ijaws into the armed forces. Thus, he contributed immensely to the
recruitment of Rivers and Ijaw youths into the Navy and the Airforce, apart from
the Army. He was a full-fledged general
in a major’s rank
These extraordinary qualities of Boro are brought to bear
here in order to challenge the intellectual and political orientation of
contemporary youth leaders. While many
Ijaw contemporary youth leaders have demonstrated an unquestionable loyalty to
the cause of the Niger Delta, some have fallen by the way side by joining the
other side due to money and self glory. In recent times, some youth leaders, suddenly
empowered with the possession of guns, have turned the guns against their own
communities, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters in an effort to enhance
their narrow self-interests. Some have
openly become the hired hands of nefarious politicians and enemies of the Niger
Delta by killing or willing to do the killings of selected individuals in the
region. Some have too much ego and find
it difficult to serve under the authority of others. Some have turned to crime and create serious
insecurity for their own people. Some
talk too much when they should be listening and strategizing. Some have very simplistic and one dimensional
view of the entire struggle and believe that political and diplomatic efforts
should be terminated to allow for a total armed struggle.
One Dimensional Approach
Of all these developments, the view that political and
diplomatic efforts should be shed or terminated to allow for full military
confrontation is the biggest concern here. The Ijaw people cannot and should not put all
their eggs in one strategic military basket.
A multidimensional approach should always guide the struggle. These are the reasons:
1. It is suicidal to
go for an all out military confrontation since many of the youth groups are
undisciplined.
2. Some fighters are there for the money. This means that they are like mercenaries and
can easily be bought over to do the biddings of the detractors. Such individuals would in most likelihood
betray the dedicated ones and foil any attempt to achieve tangible victory.
3. The groups are
too scattered and are not consolidated.
It seems that every locality or clan or town or village has it own
group. The lack of consolidation will
lead to disaster in the event of a major confrontation. Without ethnic-wide consolidation, many youth
groups cannot reinforce their positions in the event of a major military
confrontation. For example, the Odi and
Odiama Boys could not reinforce militarily to counterattack, hence, the innocent
citizens of their communities paid with their lives and properties. One would have expected them to retreat as
guerillas, reinforce, and counterattack to dislodge the security forces. Instead, they disappeared from the theater of
operation to save themselves.Nembeland is
troubled by the conflict involving Odiama, Bassambiri, and Obioku. Ogbolomabiri and Bassambiri had their own
wars within Nembe Town. Odiama was
victimized by the intra-Nembe conflicts. The Kalabari and Okrika Boys still find it
difficult to work together in a way that can lead to trust and cooperative
intergroup reinforcement. Moreover, in
both areas, the competition for power among various armed elements make them
easy targets since Nigeria can play one group against another. This accounted for the destructive turf wars
in Tombia, Bagana, Buguma, Abuloma, and Okrika Town. The exception was the Warri front in which the
youths fought under a consolidated command structure that enabled them to
reinforce and counterattack successfully.
4. A one dimensional
approach will actually play into the strategic and tactical advantage of
Nigeria, the oil companies, and the international oil consuming nations. First, they would seize the opportunity to
sponsor elements within the society who are hungry for money to carry out
tactical killing of Ijaw people and then blame the killings on the Ijaws in
order to sow distrust and civil war among members of the ethnic group. Second, they would intentionally send people (
special forces, fifth columnists etc.) to terrorize other ethnic groups in the
region and blame it on Ijaw fighters, thereby,
pitting other groups against the Ijaws. Third, they would simply characterize Ijaw
youth groups as terrorist organizations and tarnish the entire struggle, even at
the United Nations and the African Union. Fourth, the Ijaws will loss credibility. Fifth, a one dimensional approach could turn
the entire Niger Delta, especially Ijawland, into Darfur in Sudan or the
Democratic Republic of the Congo or Uganda or Sierra Leone etc. It should be noted that conflicts involving
the control of natural resources often become very complicated and unnecessarily
prolonged due to the many forces and interests that get involved.
5. A one dimensional
approach is most likely to result in a situation similar to the Nigerian civil
war, thereby, making it easy for Nigeria to identify its target, institute
embargo on food and other essential resources through naval blockade. It would be a gargantuan mistake to apply the
civil war model on the current resource control battle.
Multiple Strategic Option:
Ijaw youths, Isaac Boro’s Day should be a day for serious
reflection on the potential implications of various actions and inactions. Thus, instead of going haywire on militarism,
a three dimensional approach should be the guiding orientation of the Ijaws at
all times. Instead of putting all the
eggs in one basket filled with holes, the Ijaws should go for a combination of
political, legal, and military options.
These are the benefits of adopting a multiple option:
1. Although the Ijaw
ethnic group is the fourth largest ethnic group in the country, not much is
known about the Ijaws. Others basically
relate to the Ijaws in a stereotypical fashion. It is the responsibility of the Ijaws to
consciously inform others through political intermingling and negotiations. One way to do so is to be fully engaged, in
every activity that involves the gathering of Nigeria’s ethnic groups and
educate them about the situation in the Niger Delta.
2. Ijaws have spent
most of their time engaged in protest politics. Protest politics imply negativity and weakness. It is a reactive tactic and does not allow
for imaginative and creative options. It
is a tactics frequently associated with those who are not familiar with the art
of politics. The Ijaws have to
demonstrate that they are sophisticated political players, at any level, at all
times. The only way to demonstrate
political sophistication is to be politically engaged with others by being
engaged, regardless of the slow pace of the process, Sometimes, symbolism is as important as
tangible results.
When others become less frightened of Ijaw power, they will
be more willing to give in to Ijaw propositions. Since the Ijaws have been outsiders in the
national corridors of power, the Hausa, Fulani, and the Yorubas, in particular,
are afraid that giving too much power to the Niger Delta groups through resource
control could lead to economic disaster for them. The Ijaws can solve the problem by being
engaged through diplomacy. Chief Albert
Horsefall, in a recent media interview, showed a great mastery of diplomatic
capability. Others, including Chief Dappa
Biriye, Oronto Douglas, Kimse Koko, E. K. Clark, Ogon Patterson, Nengi James,
etc, also have this rare skill. The Ijaws
must use this skill and not fear negotiations.
3. A multiple
approach provides a fail/safe mechanism for the Ijaws. Basically, if the political option does not
yield fruit, the legal option provides another weapon to continue the same
struggle. If the legal option does not
bear fruit, the political option can open doors. On the other hand, if neither the political
nor the legal option works, the military option is always there to put teeth
into Ijaw threats. In other words, the
military option should be a tool to enhance the political and legal
options. The military option should
always be a last resort option, since it is necessary to exhaust the political
and legal options. Moreover, it is
impossible to gain international support for the struggle by relying on the
military option as the first option. Of
course, the political and legal routes can be agonizingly slow since it involves
a give and take process.
4. A multiple option
allow for the effective utilization of human resources. The elders and the youths can automatically
get involved in the process. This further
means that the elders, elected public officials, bureaucrats, traditional
leaders, professionals, students, non-governmental public officials, villagers,
teachers, etc can be part of the struggle. A military option tends to exclude all those
who are not involved in the armed resistance. It creates a “we vs. them” syndrome among the
armed elements and the civilian population, leading to the “bloody civilian”
complex that is a source of frequent friction between civilians and soldiers in
Nigeria.
5. A solely military option tends to create the feeling
of ‘we are the patriots and you not a
patriot’ syndrome also. For instance,
when some youth leaders recently criticized Ijaw leaders for participating in
the National Political Reform Conference, it automatically divided the ethnic
nation into the patriots versus the non-patriots political fault-lines. In both Nigeria and Biafra, there was also
this feeling, hence, the characterization of Nigerian civilians as the “Bloody
civilians” and policemen as “women” by soldiers because they were not
fighting.
6. A multiple option
allows for the democratization of the struggle since leaders must listen to the
generality of Ijaw and Niger Delta public opinion before taking action. It allows for input from different
sources. On the other hand, a military
option tends to incline toward authoritarianism since military leaders always
tend to dictate rather than negotiate options.
7. A multiple option
allows for a regional approach since other ethnic groups must be consulted in
order to form a common alliance. A
military option might not do so, especially if youths from other ethnic groups
are not willing to adopt a military option at the same time as the Ijaw
youths.
The Need for Unity:
Ijaw youths, it is very clear that the Niger Delta struggle
requires a multiple approach since the situation is very delicate. The struggle requires an indepth analysis of
the possibilities. The struggle requires
youth leaders who are capable of serious contemplation of various implications
and potentials. Serious contemplation is
needed so that the ethnic group and the entire region are not trapped in an
un-winnable situation.
Already, there is a semblance of the multiple approach at
work. The Ijaw National Congress is more
efficient at diplomatic dealings while the Ijaw Youth Council is more suitable
at the actualization of practical actions and results. The armed youths tend to threaten physical
action. This approach should be
nourished and maintained without one element openly accusing the others of
selling out or not being proactive.
Isaac Boro knew this, hence, he was contemplative and
combined action with diplomacy. He took
physical action but was also keenly aware of the political implications.
To celebrate his honor, it is necessary to shun egotism,
self-glorification and agrandizement, oversimplification of the struggle, and
incessant desire for money. It is
necessary to open the mouth or talk at the most appropriate time. Remain quiet while being attentive and active
at other times. There is room for
political negotiations, legal actions, and militancy. In short, the political, legal, and military
options are complementary to one another and should not be viewed as mutually
exclusive or incompatible. Open your eyes
and ears and think very deeply before acting out.
The challenges for today’s youth leaders are:
1. Look at the total
picture, not only at the partial scene, before acting or speaking.
2. Recognize the fact
that other options are as important as militancy.
3. Shun unnecessary
threats and egoistical statements.
4. Avoid get-rich
schemes because the detractors are always coming with bags of money to turn you
into Judases.
5. Control
self-glorification and gratification.
6. Do not engage in
criminal activities.
7. Do not be a threat
to your own communities
8. Be selfless and
dedicate yourself to the struggle.
Remember, united we stand and divided we fall.
May Isaac Boro and all the heroes who paid the ultimate price
rest in perfect peace.
A Press Statement on the
Activities marking the 2005 Isaac Boro Memorial
By
Alhaji Mujahid
Dokubo-Asari
Chairman, Niger Delta
People’s Salvation Front (NDPSF)
___________________________________________
This year’s Isaac Boro Memorial was to be celebrated beginning from the
2nd to the 16th of May, with an already outlined programme for which we
sought Police Permit in Rivers state. However, the State Police Command
turned down our request to hold the Boro Memorial celebration in Rivers
State.
The Niger Delta People’s
Salvation Front (NDPSF), the Niger Delta People’s Volunteer Force (NDPVF) in
collaboration with other progressive and revolutionary organisations across the
Niger Delta decided to move the planned activities to Bayelsa state, which to us
as Ijaws, represents our cradle and homeland. However, these activities were
again disrupted by the government of the so-called ‘Governor-General’ of the
Ijaw nation, Diepreye Alamieyeseigha. Governor Alamieyeseigha had without the
prompting of the Federal Government or any other person(s) or institution(s),
decided to turn this year’s Isaac Boro Memorial into ‘Rivers of Blood’, the
blood of the Ijaw people. He called up General Olusegun Obasanjo who was on a
state visit to South Africa after his initial request for troop deployment from
the Nigerian military was turned down because the military felt that an
operation to stop the One-Million-Man-March of the Niger Delta People’s
Salvation Front, The Niger Delta People’s Volunteer Front and other
collaborating organisations will lead to loss of lives, and it was only the
President of the Nigerian state, General Obasanjo (rtd.) who could give such an
order.
Alamieyeseigha has clearly established a pattern of committing and supporting
acts of genocide against his own people. At the black market in Yenagoa
in 1999, countless number of Ijaw people and youths who he had despicably
used as political thugs in his bid to become governor at all cost were
killed. In December 1999, he moved his murderous machine into Odi and totally
erased the community from the map of the Ijaw nation, under the guise of
looking for the killers of policemen! He justified this gruesome act of
destruction, killing and maiming by saying that if he had not done so,
a State of Emergency would have been declared by the General Obasanjo regime,
in which case, he will cease to be governor. For him, his remaining
as Governor is more important than the lives and properties of the Ijaws.
Before we could remove
the gory memory of Odi from our minds, Alamieyeseigha was again at Odiama,
visiting death and destruction on that ancient community. Even the Amayanabo was
not spared. ‘The Gateman of Katsina’ was at it again, leaving in his trail,
death, pain and destruction. This time, he justified his action again by citing
the brutal murder of councillors of Nembe Local Government Council by people
suspected to have come from Odiama.
For a long time, we have
overlooked sins of Governor Alamieyeseigha, who has been used as an example of
the inability of the Ijaw people to govern themselves. Several other Ijaws have
pointed to the huge amount of resources accruing to Bayelsa state with only
eight (8) local governments, with no visible development commensurate with the
amount of resources that have accrued to the state. Alamieyeseigha is known to
be the most reckless, corrupt and inept political leaders in Nigeria. It is
alleged that billions of naira of Bayelsa money was spent for him to become ‘The
Gateman of Katsina’. The whole of Bayelsa state was shut down while private and
chartered planes were contracted to ferry people to Katsina from every part of
the country. Ninety percent of Bayelsa elites would have perished on that day,
when these un-airworthy and near-dilapidated airplanes crash landed at Katsina
airport. God was merciful to our people. The story would have been different
now.
Alamieyeseigha’s madness
became more manifest during the recent convocation ceremony of his daughter in
the United States. The ‘whole’ of Bayelsa state was ferried to the US. Reports
of this show of shame was published and hosted on all Ijaw websites all over the
world. So many Ijaws all over the world, buried their heads in shame, as we
could not explain to our friends from other nationalities why we allowed this
megalomaniac and ‘Gateman of Katsina’ to oversee our affairs. The disgrace
caused us and the damage done can not easily be repaired.
Why did Alamieyeseigha
want to kill us?
To
Alamieyeseigha, our rising profile is fast undermining his self-styled status of
‘Governor-General’ of the Ijaw nation. He has weakened and destroyed the Ijaw
National Congress (INC), the Ijaw Youth Council (IYC). Most of the gullible
leaders of these organisations do not know or pretend not to know that that
Alamieyeseigha is deeply hand-in-glove with our enemies who seek to extinguish
the flame of the Ijaw struggle.
What Alamieyeseigha did on the 16th of May clearly shows that he does not
have any regard or respect for the unity of Ijaw people. He could not call
his Commissioner of Police to order, a non-Ijaw, speaking his mind, said
that an Ijaw man from Rivers, Delta, Akwa Ibom, Ondo and Edo states do
not have the right to come to Bayelsa state to celebrate the memory of
Boro. This would have done irreparable damage to the unity of the Ijaw
nation, but we will not be reduced to the level of this self-serving, self-styled
Governor-General of Ijaw nation and ‘Gateman of Katsina’. We feel very
sorry for him, for we know where history will place him.
General Obasanjo has
broken our mutual agreement
The agreement we had with
Gen Obasanjo at Abuja was that we will be guaranteed the constitutional rights
to freedom of speech, freedom of association and freedom of movement without let
or hindrance, as long as we operate within the framework of the oppressive laws
of the Nigerian State. We duly applied for Police Permits. Our applications were
turned down. We were travelling on a Federal Highway without any intent to harm
or cause injury to other persons. We were stopped, harassed, brutalized and
detained. We did not react because we want the whole world to know that our path
to freedom is very clear and we would not be stampeded to carrying out actions
that are not in our overall interest. This clearly shows that General Obasanjo
is not a man of honour, who keeps faith with agreements
reached.
We have kept our own part
of the agreement. We have totally disarmed and demobilized. If we had acted on
May 16 the way they had predicted we would, the story would have been different
for Nigeria, but we had collectively decided to give a last trial to the PRONACO
Initiative for a Sovereign National Conference, believing that the outcome of
the conference will be the only panacea for the peaceful co-existence and
cooperation of the various nationalities, who were forcefully conscripted into
the Nigerian enterprise. For Obasanjo, we will say that we will not be deterred
and intimidated. Nor will we allow ourselves to abandon the struggle for the
total liberation of our people. God is our witness.
The Arrest of Honourable
Kingsley Kemebradigha Kuku
Honourable Kingsley Kuku, Member of the Ondo State House of Assembly, Collegiate
Leader and Former Spokesman, Ijaw Youth Council (IYC) was arrested on the
19th of May and detained by the Ondo State Police Command, after addressing
the Boro’s Day rally at Obuama in the Kalabari Kingdom of the Ijaw Nation,
on spurious charges of harbouring criminals at his residence in Akure.
Items recovered from his house were his licensed cartridge pump action,
Isaac Boro’s memorial posters, prepared speeches, a special ornamented
Arabian sword and Egbesu insignias. Kingsley Kuku has been detained from
the time of his arrest to the time of this press release, without any intention
of granting him bail. If a lawmaker of Ondo State can be so humiliated,
what about ordinary Ijaw people who do not have such protection under the
laws of the Nigerian State. We demand for the immediate release of Comrade
Kingsley Kuku, for his continuous incarceration will not be tolerated.
The veil has been
removed
Governor Alamieyeseigha
the ‘Gateman of Katsina’ should be seen by all Ijaws as our enemy number one and
the chief pharaohic taskmaster of General Obasanjo, maximum ruler of the
Nigerian state. Our people must be protected from the murderous machine of the
‘Gateman of Katsina’ for as he keeps watch over Katsina people, he kills, maims
and destroys our people.
Security Situation in Rivers State
There has been a rising spate of killing, hijack, kidnapping and extortion
in Rivers State. This has clearly shown the inability of the government
and security agencies to protect the life and property of the ordinary
citizen which was the situation in 2003 when life became unbearable and
hellish for our people. We reacted against the massive killings, intimidation
and extortion of our people. We were labelled cultists for standing on
the side of the people. Now the events are re-enacting themselves. When
we react again, we would be further labelled as fighting for bank robbery
territory, drugs territory and bunkering territory. The people of Rivers
State will not allow the re-enactment of the events of the past. We stand
firmly with the people on this matter, and we call on the government to
promptly equip their security agents to contain this senseless wasting
of our people’s lives and properties.
For us, the struggle is
unstoppable.
God bless the Ijaw
Nation, God bless the Niger Delta

Alhaji Mujahid
Dokubo-Asari
Boro's World
People:
It must be interesting to say that Isaac Boro will remain
indelible in our world as Ijaws.He was a brave man of vision who along with his
friends challenged the government of the 60s,demanding social and economic
justice for his people. What makes him a hero to this day is the vision and
courage to embark on a burdensome undertaking, oblivious of personal safety, all
for a people he knew were oppressed by their more powerful
neighbors.
A reading of Tony Talkative's Twelve Day Revolution reveals
Boro's world.Which justifies why he did what he did.
I particularly remember the movie-like disguise scene when he breaks into
the office of D.O. Luckily, should I say, the divisional officer in charge
of Yenegoa was not "on seat". Boro had wanted to ask the man
a single question.And the question was:"Are you also a white man"?
Is there no Ijaw man or woman qualified for this job on the
face of the earth? No offence intended here the DO was Igbo by ethnic group.
Thus,for Boro and his band of angry men: Dick,Owonaro,Amangala etc, it was time
for a wind of change. I remember that Okrika Grammar School, a school built by
the good people of Wakirike, had an Igbo principal called Mr. Offor. Would you
blame him for catering for his own Igbo people more than the owners of the
school? Just these two examples should show you what a slice of life was like in
Boro's world.
Boro was ready,so his men. But they lacked money for it was
scarce in those days,more so for our sea-faring peoples who relied mostly on
perishables with no access to loans or scholarships. He quit his job,sold his
frigidaire,possibly borrowed money and raised a ticket to Ghana to seek the
support of the great Nkrumah. Here, something terrible happened! Nkrumah
referred Boro to a well respected Nigerian friend of his who happened to be SG
Ikoku, and principal of the Ideological Institute at Winneba, Ghana. At this
point Boro knew this was the most unlikely place to get help, for Ikoku, an
Igbo, would never assist him in a revolutionary enterprise which benefitted the
Igbo of that day. He returned accomplishing little from this
trip.
Nevertheless, he did raise consciousness and for the first
time forced attention to be paid to us. He lost his case against the government.
Don't forget no one wins a treason case in Nigeria. The great Awo also lost his
treason case. Ojukwu fled only to return to a presidential pardon in 1980.
Saro-Wiwa who ceremoniously or could it be sacrilegiously{?}burnt the Nigerian
flag got the noose for violating the sacrosanct.
The price may just be high but Rivers State was created and
paid for by the blood of good men, Boro being the leader of the militant wing.
Has that world changed very much? Can there be non militant Boros in our midst
who are willing to build on that solid foundation ? Have we all done our part
to make our Ijaw world better? Or ,do we remain prisoners of a past long
gone?
What would Boro say about absentee chairmen who have
done little for the people? Have we snowballed from the tragic to the farcical?
Do we blame others for problems we create?
An honest response to some of these questions may open the
door to a new world. Hopefully,a world to make Boro proud.
Dagogo
Josiah writes from Miami., FL.
|